Out-of-school contact with L2 English across four educational levels

Rosa Alonso Alonso

doi:10.58859/rael.v21i1.509

Authors

Rosa Alonso Alonso Universidad de Vigo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58859/rael.v21i1.509

Keywords:

out-of-school contact, learners perceptions, out-of-school activities, informal learning, skills

Abstract

This paper aims at analyzing learners’ perspectives on the improvement of the four skills, vocabulary and grammar with out-of-school contact with L2 English, their interest in including out-of-school activities in the classroom, the type of activities they report doing out of-school and their perception of the advantages and disadvantages of using out-of-school activities in the classroom. Four groups of participants took part in the study (secondary education, baccalaureate, state language schools and university). A questionnaire has been used and quantitative and qualitative analyses have been conducted. Findings indicate that the four groups perceived improvement in all skills but not in grammar. All groups are interested in including out-of-school activities in the classroom, the activities they tend to practise out-of-the classroom involve mainly listening. Finally, improving their English skills, having fun and learning socially are the main advantages they report, while losing attention and learning incorrect grammar are the main disadvantages.

Author Biography

Rosa Alonso Alonso, Universidad de Vigo

Rosa Alonso Alonso is an Assistant Professor at the University of Vigo. Her research interests include second language acquisition, thinking-for-speaking and out-of-school learning. She is currently the editor of Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics.

References

Azzolini, D., Campregher, S., & Madia, J. E. (2020) Formal instruction vs informal

exposure: What matters more for teenagers’ acquisition of English as a sec-

ond language? Research Papers in Education, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1789718

Barbee, M. (2013) Extracurricular L2 input in a Japanese EFL context: Exposure, attitudes, and motivation. Second Language Studies, 32(1), 1–58.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012) Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper (ed.) APA handbook of research methods in psychology: Vol. 2. Research designs. (pp. 57-91) Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Cross, J. (2006) Informal learning. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.

Gass, S., Winke, P., Isbell, D., & Ahn, J. (2019) How captions help people learn languages: A working-memory, eye-tracking study. Language Learning & Technology, 23 (2), 84-104.

Hannibal Jensen, S.H. (2017) Gaming as an English language learning resource among young children in Denmark. CALICO Journal, 34(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.29519

Larsen-Freeman, D. & Cameron, L. (2008) Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Leona, N., Van Koert, M.,van der Molen, M. Rispens, M., Tims, J. and Snellings, P. (2021) Explaining individual differences in young English language learners’ vocabulary knowledge: The role of extramural English exposure. System, 96(1), 1-13

Lindgren, E., & Muñoz, C. (2013) The influence of exposure, parents, and linguistic distance on young European learners’ foreign language comprehension. International Journal of Multilingualism, 10(1), 105–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2012.679275

Lomicka, L., & Lord, G. (Eds.). (2009) The next generation: Social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning. Texas: Texas State University.

Muñoz, C. (2020) Boys like games, girls like movies. Resla 33 (1),171-201

Muñoz, C. & Cadierno, T. (2021) How do differences in exposure affect English language learning? A comparison of teenagers in two learning environments. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2, 185-212

Peters, E. (2018). The effect of out-of-school exposure to English language media on learners’ vocabulary knowledge. ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 169(1), 142–167. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.00010.pet

Rieder, A. (2003) Implicit and explicit learning in incidental vocabulary acquisition. Views, 12-2.

Sockett, G. (2011) Les processus cognitifs de résolution de problèmes pour l’apprentissage des langues dans des environnements multimédia: Apprentissage informel et réseaux sociaux. Les Cahiers de l’ACEDLE, 8, (1), 29-46.

Sockett, G. (2013) Understanding the online informal learning of English as a complex dynamic system: an emic approach. ReCALL 25 (1), 48-62

Sockett, G. (2014) The Online Informal Learning of English. London: Palgrave MacMillan

Sockett, G. &Toffoli, D. (2012) Beyond learner autonomy: a dynamic systems view of the informal learning of English in virtual online communities. ReCALL, 24 (2), 138-151.

Stevens, A. (2010) Etude sur l’impact des technologies de l’information et de la communication (TIC) et des nouveaux médias sur l’apprentissage des langues. Commission Européenne. http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/llp/studies/documents/study_impact_ict_new_media_language_learning/final_report_fr.pdf.

Thorne, S. L. & Reinhardt, J. (2008) “Bridging Activities,” New Media Literacies and Advanced Foreign Language Proficiency. CALICO Journal, 25(3), 558-572.

Tissot. P. (2004) Terminology of vocational training policy. A multilingual glossary for an enlarged Europe. Luxembourg: CEDEFOP.

Toffoli, D. & Sockett, G. (2010) How non-specialist students of English practice informal learning using web 2.0 tools. Asp, 58, 125-144

Wisnieska, N., & Mora, J. C. (2020) Can captioned video benefit second language pronunciation? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(3), 599-

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263120000029